http://www.insurancnews.com Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:26:28 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 http://www.insurancnews.com/2008/07/10/geico-sucks-2000-pontiac-firebird-accident-didnt-pay-for-diminished-value-due-to-vehicle/#comment-4 frank Thu, 10 Jul 2008 18:48:25 +0000 http://www.insurancecrap.com/?p=7#comment-4 if you knew what you are talking about... you would know that an insurance company does not OWE you diminished value... in fact, the value should not be diminished if repaired to pre loss conditions.... people are just dense and don't want to pay as much for a car that has "been in an accident". but to you i suppose that all you just heard was blah blah blah blah, because theres nothing in it for you? thought so... if you knew what you are talking about… you would know that an insurance company does not OWE you diminished value… in fact, the value should not be diminished if repaired to pre loss conditions…. people are just dense and don’t want to pay as much for a car that has “been in an accident”. but to you i suppose that all you just heard was blah blah blah blah, because theres nothing in it for you? thought so…

]]> http://www.insurancnews.com/2008/07/10/geico-sucks-2000-pontiac-firebird-accident-didnt-pay-for-diminished-value-due-to-vehicle/#comment-3 frank Thu, 10 Jul 2008 18:47:47 +0000 http://www.insurancecrap.com/?p=7#comment-3 WOW WOW

]]>